Julian Jaynes Society Forum

Julian Jaynes Society Discussion Forum: Exploring Consciousness and the Bicameral Mind Theory since 1997

** PLEASE NOTE: Due to spam, registration is now BY REQUEST ONLY. To register (free), please e-mail info "at" julianjaynes "dot" org with your desired username; you will receive a login and temporary password. ** julianjaynes.org        
It is currently Sat Oct 20, 2018 10:00 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Bicameral Mind As A Dynamic
PostPosted: Fri Nov 15, 2013 11:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 10
First, I very much appreciate this forum. Thank you.

I have some questions regarding the hypothesis.

Is is correct to understand Bicameralism as a continuation of the ability to control oneself and one's environment, and to the degree that one is subject to their automatic response system?

Is the concept trying to explain how humans evolved from an animal mentality, to a semi-conscious mentality, and a future fully conscious mentality?

Is Bicameral 'development' a function of analog models and useful principles as a means of creating mind space, moving the human mentality from bicameralism to consciousness?

Thank you again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bicameral Mind As A Dynamic
PostPosted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 3:15 pm
Posts: 11
Jim, complicated subject. The bicameral mind, as theorized by JJ, is a pre-conscious mind, devoid of consciousness as we define it. I suspect from your questions that you haven't read JJ's work. Briefly,

-- No, the theory of bicameral mind has nothing to do with "a continuation of the ability to control oneself and one's environment."

-- The concept/theory explains how human consciousness evolved from pre-consciousness, not a "semi-conscious mentality," and it does not project anything similar to a "future fully conscious mentality."

-- Not sure what you mean by, "Is Bicameral 'development' a function of analog models and useful principles as a means of creating mind space, moving the human mentality from bicameralism to consciousness?"

Many of these questions would be quickly answered by reading Jaynes' major work. The issues are complex enough that they don't lend themselves to short answers that you'd find satisfactory. An in-depth read would prove well worth your time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bicameral Mind As A Dynamic
PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 10
pcg wrote:
I suspect from your questions that you haven't read JJ's work.


I have read the book. Maybe I did not phrase my questions clear enough.

pcg wrote:
--No, the theory of bicameral mind has nothing to do with "a continuation of the ability to control oneself and one's environment."

I understood that bicameral minds were subject to their automatic response system. The more automatic a person is, the less authoritative that person is. It is possible that conscious people seemed like gods to unconscious people.

pcg wrote:
--The concept/theory explains how human consciousness evolved from pre-consciousness, not a "semi-conscious mentality," and it does not project anything similar to a "future fully conscious mentality."


The "future conscious mentality" is a theoretical addition to Jaynes' theory. Here is an example:
http://www.mind-trek.com/reports/tl10-2.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bicameral Mind As A Dynamic
PostPosted: Mon Nov 25, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 10
So, does it make sense to say that, the less bicameral someone is, the less automatic?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bicameral Mind As A Dynamic
PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2014 9:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:06 pm
Posts: 10
Well, to correct this up a bit:

Automatizing reactions is natural for people to do simply to conserve energy. We spend most of our time recalling information instead of constantly being aware. So the correct statement is being consciously aware is not being automatic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


Gods, Voices and the Bicameral Mind               Julian Jaynes Collection               Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness               The Minds of the Bible               Abstracts from the 2013 Julian Jaynes Society Conference on Consciousness and Bicameral Studies



Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007~ phpBB Group