Julian Jaynes Society Forum

Julian Jaynes Society Discussion Forum: Exploring Consciousness and the Bicameral Mind Theory since 1997

** PLEASE NOTE: Due to spam, registration is now BY REQUEST ONLY. To register (free), please e-mail info "at" julianjaynes "dot" org with your desired username; you will receive a login and temporary password. ** julianjaynes.org        
It is currently Wed Aug 15, 2018 10:28 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: What "Is" Consciousness?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 2
Location: Williamstown, MA
I'll dare to start this topic. Here's a short, one-page, description:

www.xenodochy.org/philosophy/consciousness.html

_________________
Ralph E. Kenyon, Jr.
http://www.xenodochy.org/ralph.html
It's not that seeing is believing, believing is seeing,
and we're much better at believing than we are at seeing.


Last edited by diogenes on Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:01 pm
Posts: 21
Location: Wimbledon
Interesting links. I like the mirror analogies.

I tend to think that the Bicameral Mind offered a better balance between self (left) and the external world (right). In other words we felt a more profound conection with the world around us, and were less self-obsessed rather than necessarily less self-aware. Perhaps being more aware of our environment might actually make us more self-aware, as a result of feeling more important in some connected sense.

Perhaps some bicameral civilisations went too far the other way, with the worship of 'gods' taking precedence to some detrimental degree.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jan 02, 2007 2:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 3:36 pm
Posts: 17
In regard to the model of consciousness (see the first link) offered for consideration by diogenes, I see a problem:

If it were true that consciousness was a function of each hemisphere of the brain monitoring the other hemisphere through the corpus callosum, it follows that patients who have had the corpus callosum severed surgically should lose the capacity for consciousness.

Although Jaynes never specifically states that such "split-brain" patients retain the capacity for consciousness, I think that he WOULD have mentioned it if they did not. In fact, it takes rather elaborate experiments to find the mental deficits of split-brain patients. I think that somebody would have noticed and reported a loss of the capacity for consciousness in such patients, considering how extensively they have been studied, if such a deficit existed. I have read some of the "split-brain" literature (some of Gazzaniga's writings, for instance) and I am not aware of any such report. Therefore, I respectfully suggest that the model of consciousness presented by Mr. Kenyon (diogenes) is incorrect.

_________________
Mark Zima

My blog (essays+forum) site is godmemes.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:38 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:03 pm
Posts: 314
Yes split brain patients are indeed still conscious. What seems to happen is a sort of "dual consciousness" for a period of time after the operation, with each hemisphere acting somewhat independently, but with the actions of the right hemisphere feeling to the patient something like an alien presence acting in their body.

Those interested in a good discussion of split brain patients might enjoy Of Two Minds: The Revolutionary Science of Dual-Brain Psychology by Fredric Schiffer (which also goes on to apply the concepts to therapy).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: this might interest you, if it hasn't already
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:34 pm
Posts: 8
Location: San Francisco
http://www.amazon.com/Am-Strange-Loop-D ... 0465030785

It's sort of a cutesily written book but the basic ideas are interesting. This is the Hofstadter of Godel Escher Bach fame...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What "Is" Consciousness?
PostPosted: Wed Apr 15, 2009 10:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 25
.


Last edited by Memento Mori on Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What "Is" Consciousness?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 25, 2009 10:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:09 pm
Posts: 25
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What "Is" Consciousness?
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:05 am
Posts: 1
OK OK, but none of this high sounding talk explains how this "conciousness" is "created" by the coming together of a conglomeration
of cellular material. It's nothing more that a BLOB, so HOW did this BLOB become so sophisticated ? Super GOO ? :mrgreen:


Last edited by sentrydogman on Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: What "Is" Consciousness?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:06 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 2:03 pm
Posts: 314
It sounds like you have not yet read Jaynes's book...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron


Gods, Voices and the Bicameral Mind               Julian Jaynes Collection               Reflections on the Dawn of Consciousness               The Minds of the Bible               Abstracts from the 2013 Julian Jaynes Society Conference on Consciousness and Bicameral Studies



Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007~ phpBB Group