Has Jaynes (or any others dealing with the consciousness-is-based-on-language hypothesis) written about the Narcissus myth? In the Narcissus myth, Narcissus sees a reflection of himself in a pool of water that he is gazing into and thereby becomes self-aware and even falls in love with himself.
There are numerous YouTube videos that one can find showing (non-language-using) animals, such as cats and monkeys, becoming aware of themselves via mirrors, re-enacting Narcissus to some degree.
While I can easily see how language would serve to make any such visually achieved 'analog-I" and "metaphor-me" thoughts more stable, is language really absolutely necessary for such achievement of self-consciousness? Why couldn't visual methods of mirroring oneself be sufficient?
When I first read The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, I was concurrently beginning a meditation practice. I couldn't help but wonder how stopping the internal verbal monologue of the mind in meditation would affect consciousness, if consciousness truly required language. Wouldn't such meditation be expected to undermine consciousness, rather than enhance it?
If, on the other hand, consciousness relates to the enteroceptive information brought together in the Anterior Insular Cortex (AIC) as it creates its subjective representations of what it feels like to be you, might not this suffice for self-reflection necessary and sufficient for consciousness?
Narcissus and Self-Consciousness
Discussion of Julian Jaynes's first hypothesis - that consciousness (as he carefully defines it) is based on language, and related topics.
Return to “1.0. Hypothesis One: Consciousness Based On Language”
Jump to
- JJS Forum
- ↳ General Discussion
- ↳ News Items Related to Jaynes's Theory
- ↳ Book Discussion: The Origin of Consciousness and Julian Jaynes Society Publications
- ↳ Myths, Misconceptions, and Fact Checks About Julian Jaynes's Theory
- ↳ Brian J. McVeigh's Random Thoughts
- ↳ Julian Jaynes
- ↳ Conferences, Events, and Local Discussion Groups
- ↳ Lecture Discussion
- ↳ Interview and Q&A Discussion
- ↳ 1.0. Hypothesis One: Consciousness Based On Language
- ↳ 1.01. Hypothesis One: Consciousness Based On Language | Subtopic: Consciousness & Dreams
- ↳ 1.02. Hypothesis One: Consciousness Based On Language | Subtopic: Consciousness in Children
- ↳ 1.03. Hypothesis One: Consciousness Based On Language | Subtopic: Consciousness and AI
- ↳ 2.0. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind
- ↳ 2.1. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind | Subtopic: Auditory Hallucinations in Normal Adults
- ↳ 2.2. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind | Subtopic: Hallucinations & Imaginary Companions in Children
- ↳ 2.3. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind | Subtopic: Hypnosis, Possession & Altered States of Consciousness
- ↳ 2.4. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind | Subtopic: Religion & the Bicameral Mind
- ↳ 2.5. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind | Subtopic: Schizophrenia
- ↳ 2.6. Hypothesis Two: The Bicameral Mind | Subtopic: The Mentality of Pre-Literate & Pre-Modern Peoples
- ↳ 3.0. Hypothesis Three: Dating the Development of Consciousness
- ↳ 4.0. Hypothesis Four: Jaynes's Neurological Model for the Bicameral Mind
- ↳ The Bicameral Mind in Fiction, Film & Popular Culture
- ↳ Information for Students