Human Consciousness: Definition

Discussion of consciousness: what it is, what it isn't, Jaynes's ideas vs. other theorists, consciousness and language, studies of cognition in non-human species, etc.
Post Reply
finesse
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:37 pm

Human Consciousness: Definition

Post by finesse » Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:58 pm

Is here a definition of human consciousness? Is that of Theilard de Chardin the nearest, i.e. that man knows that he knows?

Memento Mori
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 9:09 pm

Re: human consciousness

Post by Memento Mori » Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:52 am

.
Last edited by Memento Mori on Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

BEN

Re: Human Consciousness: Definition

Post by BEN » Thu Sep 03, 2009 6:40 am

Yes I like it. Not sure a subjective conscious mind is the same as consciousness though. Check out the Jaynes example of the piano player on pages 25-26.
Ive been on the zeitgeist forum where I've been trying to explain consciousness. What a frustrating task. I did however come across a post with Eckhart Tolle on it, on u-tube, and watching it he was talking about the 'now', what I regard as consciousness. I found Tolle little frustrating though.
Anyway in a thread with an avid follower of Tolle :roll: he said after a lengthy discussion that, "You are not your mind, you are the one who experiences and watches the mind."
I wrote back to say, "consciousness is the one that is doing the observing and experiencing the mind."


So my definition would be, "consciousness is the mechanism that observes and experiences the mind."
That might change to, "consciousness is the mechanism that observes and experiences the mind while being aware of it's individuality and morality.
What do you think?
:lol:

martinem
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:06 am
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Re: Human Consciousness: Definition

Post by martinem » Mon Jan 11, 2010 1:50 pm

When trying to define consciousness you easily end up using predicates as know, experience or observe, all of which distinguishes between a subject and an object. This division is related to the dualisms of Plato, Descartes, and almost all the philosophers that are mentioned on page 1 in "the origin...". I think Dennet would agree on that this dualism is the most important concept to get around when trying to understanding consciousness.
Hence dualism is inherent in language, which could mean two things: 1. Language does precede consciousness, and 2. Language is incapable of describing consciousness.
Maybe we need to invent a new language to discuss consciousness? A little bit like Newton invented calculus to be able to describe gravity?

Post Reply